Sunday, August 21, 2011

10 Of The Craziest Things Michele Bachmann Has Ever Said

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/06/16/246618/bachmann-craziest-quotes/


Our guest blogger is Elon Green, a freelance writer living in Brooklyn.
Earlier this week, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) announced she had filed the papers to run for President. It’s not a frivolous pursuit: She is extremely well liked by the Republican base and is an unusually effective fundraiser, taking in more dollars in the last election cycle she than any of her Congressional colleagues.
Still, Bachmann’s candidacy is not without potential landmines. Over the last decade, she has taken positions that are dangerous, stemming from her radical ideology. To Bachmann’s credit, she is aware of this, lamenting to Glenn Beck, “I have experienced that throughout my political career, being labeled a kook.”
ThinkProgress has assembled 10 of the nuttiest things Bachmann has ever said:
(1) BACHMANN WARNED ‘THE LION KING’ WAS GAY PROPAGANDA: At the November 2004 EdWatch National Education Conference, Bachmann said the “normalization” of homosexuality would lead to “desensitization”: “Very effective way to do this with a bunch of second graders, is take a picture of ‘The Lion King’ for instance, and a teacher might say, ‘Do you know that the music for this movie was written by a gay man?’ The message is: I’m better at what I do, because I’m gay.”

(2) BACHMANN CLAIMED ABOLISHING THE MINIMUM WAGE WOULD CREATE JOBS: While testifying in front of the Minnesota Senate in 2005, Bachmann said, “Literally, if we took away the minimum wage — if conceivably it was gone — we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level.” This isn’t remotely true. Even simply reducing the minimum wage would, as Paul Krugman noted, “at best do nothing for employment; more likely it would actually be contractionary.”

(3) BACHMANN CLAIMED THAT SCIENTISTS ARE SUPPORTERS OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN: During a 2006 debate, Bachmann said, “There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design.” This was, and is, not true.

(4) BACHMANN CLAIMED TERRI SCHIAVO WAS ‘HEALTHY’: Not long after Terri Schiavo died, Bachmann said she would have voted for the Palm Sunday Compromise because Schiavo “was healthy. She had brain damage — there was brain damage, there was no question. But from a health point of view, she was not terminally ill.” An autopsy found that Schiavo had suffered irreversible brain damage and her brain, said the medical examiner, was “profoundly atrophied.”

(5) BACHMANN LIKENED VISITING IRAQ TO VISITING MALL OF AMERICA: In 2007, Bachmann returned from a junket to Iraq and told her colleagues, “[T]here’s a commonality with the Mall of America, in that it’s on that proportion. There’s marble everywhere. The other thing I remarked about was there is water everywhere.” As ThinkProgress documented at the time, the comparison was preposterous.

(6) BACHMANN CLAIMED THAT CARBON DIOXIDE IS ‘HARMLESS’: In 2008, a Stanford scientist revealed “direct links” between increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and “increases in human mortality” — globally, he found that as many as “20,000 air-pollution-related deaths per year per degree Celsius may be due to this greenhouse gas.” The next year, Bachmann, who is not a scientist, said that “carbon dioxide is portrayed as harmful. But there isn’t even one study that can be produced that shows that carbon dioxide is a harmful gas.”

(7) BACHMANN CALLED FOR A CONGRESSIONAL WITCH HUNT: Pivoting off the news of Barack Obama’s alleged relationship to former Weather Underground member William Ayers, and his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bachmann accused the candidate of having “anti-American views.” She then suggested that Congressional liberals — including Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid — ought to be subject to “an exposé” by the media because of their views. “I think people would love to see like that,” she told a stunned Chris Matthews.

(8) BACHMANN SUGGESTED GAY SINGER SHOULD REPENT AFTER GETTING CANCER: Bachmann saw Melissa Etheridge’s cancer as a teachable moment: “Unfortunately she is now suffering from breast cancer, so keep her in your prayers,” she said in November 2004. “This may be an opportunity for her now to be open to some spiritual things, now that she is suffering with that physical disease. She is a lesbian.”

(9) BACHMANN BOASTED ABOUT BREAKING THE LAW: In advance of the 2010 national Census, Bachmann told The Washington Times that she would break the law by not completing the forms. “I know for my family, the only question we will be answering is how many people are in our home,” she said. “We won’t be answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution doesn’t require any information beyond that.”

(10) BACHMANN CLAIMED THAT GLENN BECK COULD SOLVE THE DEBT CRISIS: During a February trip to South Carolina, Bachmann told a South Carolina audience, “I think if we give Glenn Beck the numbers, he can solve this [the national debt].”

Friday, August 19, 2011

상황

시대상황과 학계상황,
두 가지의 상황에 의해 내 공부가 영향을 받는 것 같다.
좋다면 좋고 아니라면 아닌..

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

무상급식

요즘 트위터에만 들어가면 무상급식 얘기가 하도 많이 있어서 계속 노출이 안될수가 없는데...
예전부터 나의 생각은 (전면)무상급식은 차선책이라는 것이다.
최선책은, (기준이 어찌됐든간에) 형편이 어려운 아이들에게만 지원하되,
학교에서 학부모가 돈을 어떻게 내고, 애들에 대한 정보는 어떻게 거두고 하는 일련의
과정들에서 그 내용이 철저하게 애들간에는 모를 수 밖에 없도록 원천적으로 정보 채널을
통제하는 방식이다.
학교에 급식비 내는 것도 지로나, 계좌이체나 무통장 입금으로만 진행시키고,
학부모와의 연락도 교사가 애들과의 정기 면담을 통해서 하거나 학부모에게 다이렉트로
연락하고... 적절한 젊은(?) 학부모에 해당되는 보호자가 없는 경우에는 그 정보가
계속 그 학생이 진학하는 동안 시스템상으로 inherit되도록 해서 애 귀찮게 할 필요가
없게 하도록 하고... 등등.

쩝...;

보수쪽도 좀 머리가 잘 안돌아간다고 생각되는게, 무상급식에 대해 복지망령이니 망국적
포퓰리즘이니 이런식의 반감 일으키는 레토릭을 쓰느니, 현행 체계를 유지하면서
그 부작용을 원천봉쇄할 수 있는 방법을 새롭게 제시하면 되는 것을....쯧쯧

암튼간에 이런 방식이 잘 현실적으로 이뤄지기 힘들다면,
밥 먹는건 지원해줘야 한다고 본다. ㅆㅂ밥 못먹으면 얼마나 서럽겠나.






Tuesday, August 9, 2011

Eminem, "Not afraid"



진짜 간만에 에미넴

It's not a budget problem, but a...

problem of insanity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/opinion/credibility-chutzpah-and-debt.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general

나는 궁금하다. 또 묻고 싶다.

상식적으로 이해가 안되는 수많은 미국사람들의 티파티 지지와 엄청난 부자감세에 대한 지지등은 어디에서 오는가?

또 누가 댓글에서 잘 지적했듯이, 크루그먼이 너무 budget deficit을 아무렇지도 않게 얘기하는데 좀 이상하다... federal deficit뿐 아니라 state 들의 debt까지 보면 미국은 지금 낼 모레 몰락한다고 해도 (이미 많은 주들이 몰락했지만) 별로 이상하지가 않다.

The end of...

(주의:요점 없는 글임)

세상에 많은 종류의 The End...시리즈가 있지만
The end of philosophy만큼 무게감 있는 것도 없을 것이다.
후쿠야마가 The End of History를 썼던 것이 1992년.
2009년엔 David Brooks가 The End of Philosophy라는 칼럼을 썼음.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/opinion/07Brooks.html?scp=1&sq=The%20End%20of%20Philosophy&st=cse

데이빗 브룩스는 물론 직업은 칼럼니스트 (NYT에서 어중띤 정치적 입장으로 포지셔닝된) 지만
그의 천성의 1/3쯤은 학자인 것 같다. 각설하고,
저 칼럼에서 moral psychologists, cognitive psychologists들의 발견들을 근거로
도덕을 설명하는데 있어서 철학의 역할은 종말이 다가왔다는 거의 진화심리학자가 다 되어 이야기한다.

진화심리학 싫어하는 사람들도 많은데 나는 그 별로 거부감 안들음. 문제는 사회학 하는 사람은
"가급적"이면 싫어해야하는게 맞음...ㅋㅋ 성별로 다른 심리적 장치가 태생적으로 장착되어 있다고
하는 sexist한 입장은 사회학자는 "도의적"으로 거부해야하는 거임..ㅎ




지방 정부 부채

미국만 문제가 아님.


http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%A9+%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80+%EB%B6%80%EC%B1%84#q=%EC%A7%80%EB%B0%A9+%EC%A0%95%EB%B6%80+%EB%B6%80%EC%B1%84&hl=en&safe=off&prmd=ivns&ei=d5xBTp75BJChtwetg-W5CQ&start=0&sa=N&fp=1&biw=1333&bih=645&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.&cad=b