영역싸움?

생각해보면 J Haidt, Jesse Graham, Pete Ditto, Brian Nosek, 류의 moral foundation연구하는 사람들과 (mapping morality)

John Jost류의 system justification연구하는 사람들, 혹은 다른 심리학자들 간에 tension이 있는가?


http://chronicle.com/article/Jonathan-Haidt-Decodes-the/130453/
두고두고 읽어볼만한 article

(여기에서 Jost가 Haidt를 비판적으로 얘기함. Jost의 Annual Review of Psych paper에도 Hadit가
중요하게 언급되지 않음...사실 그 페이퍼를 보면 너무 일방적으로 Jost 자신(류)의 페이퍼들만 인용함.
물론 Haidt가 확 뜨기 전(??)이라 그럴수도 있지만?)

I may be wrong, but it looks like there's some slight tension between the 'moral foundation' group (e.g,. Haidt, Graham, Ditto, etc.)
and the system justification theory group (e.g., Jost, Kay, etc.). The former regards the five 'moral' foundations as the building blocks and the latter looks at a few kinds of 'motivational' goals to understand attitudes and orientation and so forth.
Never realized before that the two views might not be able to get along with each other very well.